Default model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on ik_llama.cpp, 32,768-token context, 1 GiB prompt cache, 8 context checkpoints per
slot), dev @ 1eb7312f, default profile, mock sandbox (nothing executed). Iterations 2 and 3 used 32 checkpoints,
and iteration 1 used the 8 GiB prompt-cache default. The method is exactly as on the
benchmark page and in the iteration-2 score: 57 core items of
K1–K10 (with K1.1 split), build items as consistency checks only, chain and later items not scored.
- partly (body): the body states part of the item, or states it with the wrong purpose.
- partly (appendix): the value is printed only in Appendix A › Floss: strings.
- A behaviour that a string in the appendix only hints at counts as missed.
§9's new "Host identifiers read by the report model" table is in the body. Human sources: B Bitsight (names this hash), E Elastic, P Proofpoint.
"Family: Latrodectus (moderate-to-high confidence, 0.85, stated by the judge) [ev_0011, ev_0008]"
B intro
K1.1b loader
partly (body) (it. 2: found)
"Category: Trojan/Backdoor"; §4 step 4 "Drops additional payloads (DLLs or EXEs) to disk". The word "loader" and the download-and-run purpose are missing
B intro
K1.2 IcedID link
missed
files/bp.dat appears in §5.3 and §9 only as "Local configuration or payload file"
B intro; P, E
K1.4 x64 DLL; arch check
partly (body)
§2 "Type · pe, x86-64, DLL". No architecture check is mentioned
§5.2 capa rows "resolve function by parsing PE exports" and "hash data with CRC32"; §5.1 "imports only kernel32.dll and user32.dll … relying on dynamic behavior for its malicious functions". The report never says "by hash"
B Windows API resolution
K2.2 abort on failed check
missed
—
B Anti analysis
K2.3 mutex
missed
CreateMutexW appears only in the §7 imports. runnung is in the §9 table but described as "Unknown string, possibly part of a key or identifier"
B Mutex
K2.4 install, then persist
partly (body)
§4 step 5 "Establishes persistence by creating a scheduled task named "Updater" with a "LogonTrigger""; step 4 drops "in locations such as … AppData". There is no self-copy step
B Persistence
K2.5 register, then command loop
partly (body)
§4 step 6 "Exfiltrates collected system data … to C2 servers (https://skinnyjeanso.com/live/ or https://titnovacrion.top/live/) using HTTP POST requests". No registration and no loop
B Communications protocol
K2.6 update_data.dat for new C2s
partly (body)
§5.3 "Local Data Files · \update_data.dat, files/bp.dat"; §9 "Local configuration or payload file"; §4 "may write update data files". Named, but its purpose (replacement C2s) is not stated
§5.2 capa row "PEB access · B0001.019"; §7 "Debugger Detection::Process Environment Block"; §4 step 1 "accessing the PEB". §8 maps it to T1003 OS Credential Dumping ("accesses the PEB … to bypass sandboxing"), a wrong technique (see reverse direction)
B Debugger check
K3.2 process count
missed
—
B
K3.3 architecture / WOW64
missed
—
B, E
K3.4 MAC check
missed
—
B
K3.5 PEB walk + CRC32 names
partly (body)
§5.2 "capabilities including PEB access, RC4 encryption, CRC32 hashing"; §5.1 "CRC32 hashing for data integrity or obfuscation purposes"
B
K3.6 string encryption
partly (body)
§5.1 "the binary employs significant obfuscation … obfuscated stackstrings … emulation recovered 81 decoded strings, indicating runtime string resolution". The scheme is given as stackstrings, not a rolling XOR
%04X%04X%04X%04X%08X%04X appears only in Appendix A
B Bot ID
K4.2 group → FNV-1a
partly (body)
§5.2 capa row "hash data using fnv". Littlehw is now in the §9 body ("Unknown string, possibly part of a key or identifier"), and group=%lu is in the beacon format row. The three are not linked
B Group and Group ID
K4.4 two encrypted C2s
found
§5.7 "It constructs HTTP POST requests to two distinct URLs: https://skinnyjeanso.com/live/ and https://titnovacrion.top/live/"; §5.2 "Decoded strings reveal … C2 servers"
B C2 decryption
K5.1 Custom_update\Update_%x.dll
partly (body)
Custom_update is in the §9 body ("Unknown string"), and §4 and §5.4 describe drops to AppData. Update_%x appears only in the appendix
B Persistence
K5.2 task Updater, COM, at logon
found (it. 2: partly)
§1 "The malware establishes persistence by creating a scheduled task named 'Updater' with a LogonTrigger to execute its payload upon user login."; §5.4; §8 T1053.005 published. COM is not mentioned: the name and the trigger are stated, the mechanism is not
B Persistence
K5.3 update_data.dat holds new C2 URLs
partly (body)
Named in §5.3 and §9, with the purpose "Local configuration or payload file"
§5.3 "User-Agent · Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Tob 1.1)"; §5.7
B
K6.3 RC4 then base64
partly (body)
§5.7 "Network traffic is encrypted using RC4 PRGA"; the channel table says "Encryption · RC4 PRGA" (iteration 2's table said "None"). The base64 alphabet is in §9 as "Base64 alphabet" but is not tied to the traffic. 12345 is in §9 as "Likely part of a key or identifier"
B
K6.4 beacon interval
missed
—
B
K6.5 beacon format
found
§9 row counter=%d&type=%d&guid=%s&os=%d&arch=%d&username=%s&group=%lu&ver=%d.%d&up=%d&direction=%s, "POST parameter format for exfiltrated system info"; &computername=%s and &domain=%s are separate rows; &mac= is absent
B Beacon data
K6.6 beacon types 1–5
missed
—
B
K6.7 URLS/CLEARURL/COMMAND/ERROR
partly (body) (it. 2: appendix)
§9 rows COMMAND "Indicator for command execution", CLEARURL "Indicator for URL clearing", ERROR "Indicator for error state", URLS "Indicator for browser URL collection" (a wrong purpose; §5.3 "Browser Data Collection · URLS")
K7 commands. partly (body): 2 (&desklinks=[ "POST parameter for desktop links"), 3 (§5.2 "running
processes (proclist)", §4 "process lists"), 4 (§5.6 system_recon), 12 (§4 "Drops additional payloads
(DLLs or EXEs)", %s%d.exe "Pattern for dropped executable payload"), 13 (C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\rundll32.exe %s,%s
"Execution method for loading DLLs"; §4 step 7) and 18 (files/bp.dat). None of these is tied to a C2 command
ID. missed: 14, 15, 17, 19, 20.
K8 discovery: found. §5.6 lists ipconfig /all, net view /all and /all /domain, net group "Domain Admins"
/domain, whoami /groups, nltest /domain_trusts /all_trusts, systeminfo, net config workstation and the
AntiVirusProduct WMI query. The ifconfig.me lookup is missing, as in iteration 2.
K9 IOCs. found: own hashes; /live/; the User-Agent; task Updater (§1, §5.4, §10.3 and §11; iteration 2:
appendix). partly (body): mutex runnung and Custom_update (both in the §9 table with no purpose; iteration 2:
appendix / "routine"), update_data.dat. partly (appendix): Update_%x.
K10 ATT&CK. found: T1027 (published; RC4 and stackstrings), T1053.005 (published, "scheduled task named
"Updater""; iteration 2: missed), T1218.011 (published, "uses Rundll32.exe to execute code from a DLL"; iteration
2: partly). missed: T1055, T1070.004, T1059.003 (cmd.exe is named in §4 and §5.6, but the technique is not claimed).
Build consistency.skinnyjeanso.com and titnovacrion.top are on B's list of 47. Littlehw is on B's group
list, and 12345 is B's first RC4 key. Both are now in the body, but unexplained. All consistent.
K11. The only draft is the hash/imphash YARA rule. The judge fell back to text extraction, so no domain indicator
reached the export and no Suricata draft was made. Iteration 2 had two domain strings in the YARA and two DNS alerts.
Published (/iocs and the export): 1 of 8 (the sample's hashes). The two C2 domains, published in iteration 2
(source judge), are not published this time, because the judge's bundle was cut twice and the verdict fell back
to text extraction (iocs.json: 4 hashes).
Stated in the body: 8 of 8 if a value printed without a purpose counts (runnung, Custom_update, Updater
are in the new §9 host-identifier table). With a purpose, the count is 5 of 8. Iteration 2 had 5 of 8, iteration 1
had 3.
Present: 57 rows, all typed String, all cited to ev_0012 (FLOSS). 56 of the 57 values are verbatim in ev_0012.
The 57th, \Registry\Machine\x5c, is ev_0012's \Registry\Machine\ with the trailing backslash written as an escape.
So every row is cited to the entry that holds it. composer.repeated_items found one repeat (Updater twice, with two
different purposes). It was recorded unresolved rather than asked: the section's one retry had gone on a
composer.schema question. No section was cut at its cap in this run.
Reverse direction: claims no human report supports¶
Claim (quoted)
Assessment
How we know
T1003 OS Credential Dumping published: "The malware accesses the PEB (Process Environment Block) to determine its own process characteristics or to bypass sandboxing." (0.85); summary "strong indicators of system reconnaissance and credential harvesting"
contradicted
The PEB access is the debugger check and the API walk (B). No report describes credential theft
T1078 Valid Accounts published: "The binary is a Trojan/Backdoor … that performs system reconnaissance and exfiltrates data" (0.95)
unsupported
The procedure does not describe the technique
T1547.001 Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder published: "drops additional payloads … likely in the Startup folder or AppData, to ensure persistence or lateral movement"
contradicted
B, E: the only persistence is the Updater task. The Shell Folders values are E's configurable install location (K5.5)
T1005 Data from Local System: "collects browser information and potentially steals browser-related data, indicated by the User-Agent string"; §5.3 "Browser Data Collection · URLS"
contradicted
URLS is a C2 instruction (B), and the UA is the bot's own
T1041 and "exfiltrates collected system data and potentially stolen files" (§1, §4, §5.6)
unsupported as framed
B: the recon results answer command 4. The sample is a loader
"Immediate isolation … to prevent lateral movement"; §5.4 "for persistence or lateral movement"
unsupported
No report describes lateral movement
§4 step 7 / T1218.011 "potentially side-loading or loading a malicious DLL from a writable directory"
unsupported (side-loading)
B, E: rundll32 runs the DLL and command 13's payloads
§5.2 "The binary is packed or obfuscated, indicated by a high section entropy of 6.48 in .data"
contradicted (packing)
The report's own §5.1 says "no packer signatures". .data 6.48 is below packed levels
§5.8 "The sample does not contain the string "rundll32.exe" [ev_0012]"
self-contradiction
The same paragraph quotes C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\rundll32.exe %s,%s from ev_0012
T1518.001 "attempts to disable or detect security software"
unsupported ("disable"); detection is correct (derived mapping)
correct but new (T1082 is the key's derived mapping)
decoded strings
§10.3 and §11 T1204.002 User Execution
new, not claimed by any analyst
—
Severity High
new (judgement)
—
Ten contradicted or unsupported claims (iteration 2: nine). 5 of the 10 published techniques have no evidence
behind them (T1003, T1078, T1547.001, T1005, T1041). Iteration 2 had one (T1014). No sentence was asked about or marked:
flagged_statements is empty, and neither narrative.ungrounded_capability nor report.rule_match_as_action fired.